Tera Gold Unfair sentencing Sogou v. Tencent Tencent Pipan Pei 200,000
TAG:Tera Gold
June 22 morning news, Tencent v. Sogou following the case of unfair competition after yesterday's verdicts, Sogou v. Tencent case of unfair competition has also been sentenced today, the results, the Beijing Second Intermediate People's Court Tencent stop "Swtor Pinyin Input Software Law "download service and compensation for economic loss of 20 million search dogs and litigation expenses 30,001 thousand dollars.
Last November 16, Sogou Pinyin Input Method v. Tencent infringement in the Beijing Second Intermediate People's Court heard in public. Both the original defendant in the trial stage, the focus is properly the subject of proceedings, unfair competition issues such as the line is set up heated debate. Full Court sentencing court did not specific the results will be announced.
Recently, Beijing Second Intermediate People's Court according to the "PRC Unfair Competition Law issued," the second, Article IX, XX and other regulations, announced the following decision:
Tencent effective date of this decision cease to provide suspects "Swtor Pinyin input method" to download the software services and acts of unfair competition, false advertising;
Orland effective date of the company in the decision to discontinue involved Swtor Pinyin input method software download service and unfair competition acts of false propaganda;
Tencent effective date in the decision to stop enticing a user to delete involved Sogou Pinyin input software shortcuts and unfair competition acts of false propaganda;
Tencent in the decision within 10 days from the date of entry into force of the two plaintiffs 20 million compensation for reasonable expenses 31,000 yuan and litigation.
Tencent effective date of the decision within 10 days of their violations involved false advertising on the site (www.Swtor.com, www.tencent.com, www.tencent.net) prominently published continuously for 72 hours to eliminate the impact statement ;
Court costs 144,355 yuan, 43,355 yuan by the commitment Sogou by EA Tencent Computer System Co., Ltd. assumes 500, by the Beijing Information Technology Co., Ltd. Orland pay 500 yuan, by Tencent Technology (EA) Co., Ltd. burden of 100,000 yuan;
Case dismissed other claims the plaintiff.
Beijing Second Intermediate People's Court said in the verdict, the defendant Tencent raised in the reply period, the jurisdiction of this court challenge, the Court decided to reject the objection to jurisdiction, Tencent appeal to the Beijing Higher People's Court during the appeal, Beijing High People's Court decided to reject the appeal, dismissed the objection to jurisdiction determined to maintain.
Final verdict said that if the defendant refuses to accept the decision, the receipt within 15 days from the date of verdict to the Beijing High People's Court of Appeal.
It is noteworthy that, Tencent v. Sogou case of unfair competition verdicts yesterday, the Beijing Intermediate Court sentenced to one in favor of Tencent, Tencent Sogou 24 million compensation.
Source: https://www.uteragold.com/
Relevant article:
https://www.mmooffer.com/